Legal Opinion

In re the General Assignment of Venable

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by Thomas Janney and another from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of December, 1905, denying a motion that the report of a referee be returned to the referee, and the reference continued, and that the hearing therein be resumed. ■ '

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

It appears that George W. Tenable and Moses J. Heyman made-a joint assignment to one Robert J. Dean for the benefit of creditors ; that the assignee proceeded with his trust and that subsequently proceedings were commenced to compel the assignee to account. In that proceeding a referee was appointed to take and state the accounts of the assignee. These hearings proceeded before the referee from" November 21, 1899, to December 1, 1900, when the proceeding was submitted to the referee for determination. The referee completed his report and his opinion upon7 the questions submitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PittmanNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re the General Assignment of VenableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of VogtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. In re VenableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API