United States v. Juvenile Male
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:
The question presented is whether retroactive application of a recent amendment to the Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5032 (Supp. II 1984), violates the ex post facto clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 9, cl. 3. The amendment provides that individuals who commit certain crimes at age fifteen may be prosecuted as adults and thus may face sentences harsher than those imposed on juveniles. The district court held that the amendment could be applied retroactively because it was merely a procedural change in the law. We reverse.
I
Defendant is charged with the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilbert Lee Evans v. Charles Thompson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.