Legal Opinion
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
Decided February 22, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Neil R. Arther City Attorney City of Kissimmee Post Office Box 1608 Kissimmee, Florida 32742-1608
Dear Mr. Arther:
You ask the following question:
May the City of Kissimmee allow water and sewer customers to pay their impact fees in several payments over time provided that proper interest is added, without violating s. 10, Art. VII, State Const.?
In sum, I am of the opinion:
The adoption of a plan whereby customers pay impact fees in several payments, rather than one payment, with interest added does not violate s. 10, Art. VII, State Const.
You state that the City of Kissimmee provides water…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Gray v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Bailey v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- City of Clovis v. Southwestern Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.