Legal Opinion

Alcoa S. S. Co. v. McMahon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1948PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Collective bargaining is the legislatively established labor policy of- the United States. That policy was expressed in the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 47 Stat. 70, 29 U.S.C.A. § 101 et seq., in the Wagner Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and in the Taft-Hartley Act, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq. Basic to the success of such a policy is responsible self discipline on the part of those who are collectively represented in such bargaining. If collectively bargained agreements are mere pious hopes which do not in fact govern the conduct of employees and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevins, Inc. v. KasmachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 6 v. Sunset Line & Twine Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1948
  3. Southern California Ry. Co. v. RutherfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1894

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  2. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local Union No. 1291Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Associated Tel. Co. v. Communication WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Wilson Brothers v. Textile Workers UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API