Espinosa v. Martin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
An action for foreclosure under power of sale provides an alternative to “costly and . . . time-consuming . . . foreclosure[s] by action . ...” In re Watts, 38 N.C. App. 90, 94, 247 S.E.2d 427, 429 (1978). At the initial hearing before the clerk of superior court, the clerk is to “find the existence of a ‘(i) valid debt of which the party seeking to foreclose is the holder, (ii) default, (iii) right to foreclose under the instrument, and (iv) notice to those entitled Id. at 93, 247 S.E.2d at 429. See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 45-21.16(d) (1996). The role of the clerk is limited to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Thermo Contracting Corp. v. Bank of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- American Travel Corp. v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Christian v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Funderburk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Carter v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Mosler Ex Rel. Simon v. DRUID HILLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re Foreclosure of Real Property Under Deed of Trust from YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.