Legal Opinion

Offutt v. Offutt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1992No. [No. 92, October Term, 1953.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSobeloff, C. J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether, under the facts, the Chancellor had authority to determine that appellee, a beneficiary under his father’s testamentary trust, is entitled to receive an allowance greater than the $200.00 monthly which the trustees have paid him since he reached his twenty-first birthday in August, 1952.

Appellee’s father confirmed in his will, probated in 1943, a pre-marital agreement which made provision for his widow and left the bulk of his estate in trust for the sole benefit of the appellee, his only son. The widow renounced the will’s provisions as to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lurman v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Abell v. AbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Kramme v. MewshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Gottschalk v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. Pole v. PietschCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Waesche v. RizzutoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. First National Bank v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Martinez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  5. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API