Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This action of contract under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 122, § 10, as amended, for the care and support of one Horrigan at the State Infirmary at Tewksbury from March 16, 1939, to January 27, 1943, raises the sole question whether previously he had acquired a settlement in the defendant city. The case was tried on a statement of agreed facts, from which the following appears: Horrigan was born in Watertown in 1881, came to Boston “in 1929,” and resided there until his admission on March 16, 1939, to the State Infirmary at Tewksbury, where he was still a patient at the time of the trial. He served…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. L. Hammett Co. v. Alfred Peats Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Inhabitants of Whately v. Inhabitants of HatfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. City of Waltham v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Inhabitants of Needham v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Walsworth v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Russomanno v. Leon Decorating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Town of Dedham v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API