Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Butler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1837PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, brought by Stinson against Bútler and others. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the defendants.

' On the trial, the plaintiff asked the Court to instruct the jury—That where lands are bounded by the Ohio river on the Indiana side, the owner’s right extends to low-water mark. This instruction was refused. The record shows that the instruction was applicable to the evidence in the cause.

We think that the instruction ought to have been given. The proprietors of land situated in this state, and bounded on one side by the Ohio river,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gentile v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. McManus v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Don H. Gunderson and Bobbie J. Gunderson, Co-Trustees of the Don H. Gunderson Living Trust v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Alliance for the Great LakesIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Carlisle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Bainbridge v. SherlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API