Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas W Keegan, J.
Petitioners have commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus seeking to compel a determination of an application for a state pollution discharge ehmination system (hereinafter SPDES) permit, to compel public hearings on such permit application, and to compel a review of the underlying SPDES permit pursuant to the provisions of Environmental Conservation Law § 17-0817. The state respondents have moved *692to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the petition fails to state a claim. The Entergy respondents have moved to dismiss on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Silver v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Committee to Preserve Brighton Beach & Manhattan Beach, Inc. v. Planning Commission of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kupersmith v. Public Health CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tooker v. New York State Crime Victims Board-Executive DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 2011