Legal Opinion

Moore v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 33,297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a suit in assumpsit to recover damages which the plaintiff alleges she has sus tained. by reason of injuries to her property resulting from a nuisance for the maintenance of which the defendant was responsible. A jury tried the ease and rendered a verdict in favor of the- defendant. The pláintiff reviews by writ of error.

For many years Mrs. Eva Moore, the plaintiff, owned and occupied as a dwelling the premises known as lot No. 10 of James Kress addition to the city of Alma, Michigan. This property fronts east on Park avenue. Nest south of it is a corner lot belonging to the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lansing v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hoffman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buddy v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sommers v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Highland Oil Corp. v. City of Lathrup VillageMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Dutt v. FalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API