In Re the Estate of Rickell

Sloan, J.,

filed a dissenting opinion as follows:

The majority opinion in this case holds that to enforce the provisions of the Act of 1929, chapter 74 (Code, art. 65, secs. 56A to 5617), would not violate the constitutional rights of any of the persons whom the act wa.s intended to benefit, nor amount to a surrender of judicial power by a state court to a federal administrative official.

The federal act, cited as “the World War Veterans’ Act, 1924,” IT. S. Code, Annotated, title 38, sections 421 to 683, which was “intended to provide a system for the relief of persons who were disabled, and for…