Legal Opinion

People v. Ah Kim

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court, Placer County. The defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

The only point made in this case is, that the record is wanting in certainty, _ and that the judgment should be reversed on that ground. The defendant was indicted under the name of Ah Keet. Upon his arraignment he stated his true name to be Ah Kim, and in pursuance of the statute this name was, by order of the Court, substituted for Ah Keet, and, the proceedings subsequently had under that name. The jury, however, in rendering the verdict, prefixed the original title of the cause—•“ People v. Ah Keet ”—and said: “ We, the jury, find defendant guilty as charged in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. OliveriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Spofford v. R. I. Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1908
  3. Plumley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API