Legal Opinion · Dissent

Landreth v. Malik

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2011No. 49732Published

1Dissent

Douglas, C.J.,

with whom Pickering, L, agrees,

dissenting:

I would deny the petition for rehearing and, therefore, I dissent.

While reasonable minds may disagree as to the plain meaning of a constitutional provision, I am concerned that the majority’s opinion short-circuits standard jurisdictional requirements by implying that a district court judge enlarges the family court’s jurisdiction simply by showing up for work. A court may exercise judicial power only when it has subject matter jurisdiction. Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657, 718 (1838) (“Jurisdiction is the power to hear and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. We The People Nevada ex rel. Angle v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API