Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*882Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the “Contraband Drug Testing Directive” regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (iv) (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033 [2011]; Matter of Maxwell v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2010]; Matter of Brown v Selsky, 38 AD3d 657 [2007]; Matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Rincon v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Maxwell v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Brown v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API