Legal Opinion
Silver v. Harriss
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 31, 1927No. 28443PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The issues in this case are similar to those in the case of Silver v. Harriss, No. 28442,115 So. 376, 1 of our docket, decided this day. The eoncursus provoked herein is for the adjustment of the unpaid claims on a contract between, the competent authorities and the defendant Harriss for the construction of that portion of the Winnsboro-Yidalia highway known as project No. 371. The other case involved the portion of the Winnsboro-Rayviile highway known as project No. 352.
Upon the default of the contractor, the surety company completed the work. The claim of plaintiff as subcontractor…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Silver v. HarrissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Daigle v. Great American Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Darouse v. MamonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- J. Watts Kearny & Sons v. PerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.