Legal Opinion
B&T Express, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2001No. 01AP-154Published
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
Appellant, B&T Express, Inc., appeals from a decision of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”) upholding civil forfeitures totaling $2,970, which the PUCO’s Motor Carrier Safety Division had assessed against B&T.
B&T is a commercial motor carrier operating out of North Lima, Ohio. Between August 19, 1998 and September 23, 1999, the staff of the Ohio Highway Patrol’s Commercial Motor Carrier Enforcement Section issued fifteen separate citations to B&T as the result of random inspections of tractor-trailer rigs that were either owned by or being operated on behalf of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001