Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Volz
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1972No. Civ. 13051PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
The state appeals from a judgment condemning a parcel for state highway purposes and awarding $150,000 in damages. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly excluded the state’s proposed evidence of a street easement traversing the property. The case was fairly tried and no prejudicial error occurred. The judgment will be affirmed.
The parcel in question comprises about six and one-half acres. It occupies an area approximately 900 feet long and 360 feet wide between the westerly edge of Riverside Boulevard and the easterly edge of the Sacramento…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ceres Terminals, Inc. v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Green v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Berkeley Lawn Bowling Club v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.