Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1993No. 92-2394PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

I

A

In 1984, John Beeson entered- into an agreement with two other individuals to purchase a controlling interest in Lincoln Savings & Loan (“Lincoln”) in Miami, Florida. As counsel, the investors chose the firm of Phillips, King & Smith (the “Firm”). The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”) objected to the participation of the two individuals, and they withdrew. Beeson then collected a group of other investors, including five of the appellants here (the Five Investors), and completed the transaction with the help of the Firm.

During this period, the Firm learned that the FHLBB might raise…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HurwitzDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  5. Elliott v. TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API