Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Gettys

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1951No. 16490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stuices, Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s action assailing the validity in specified particulars of Act No. 785 of the General Assembly, approved March 20, 1950, 46 Stat. 1964, entitled, "An Act To Establish A Consolidated High School District In Cherokee County; To Prescribe The Rights, Duties And Obligations Of Said Districts; To Provide For The Election Of Trustees And The Terms Of Office; To Prescribe Their Duties And Powers; To Transfer Certain Property And To Make Certain Appropriations And Certain Transfers Of Funds In Order To Accomplish The Objects Of The Consolidation.”

Gaffney School…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Moseley v. WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Walker v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Burriss v. BrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. FarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. City of Columbia v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. City of Conway v. Grand Strand Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
  4. Keck v. Joint Class a School District No. 370Idaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Keck v. Joint Class a School District No. 370Idaho Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API