Legal Opinion
Tunstill v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 8, 1944No. 14634PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
We are confronted with a motion to dismiss this appeal because of the lateness with which the record was filed.
Judgment was rendered in the trial court on January 10th, 1944.
Under the rules obtaining in the County of Tarrant, where there are four District Courts having jurisdiction over civil cases, the motion for a new trial should be filed within ten (10) days after judgment is rendered. The original motion was filed on January 14, 1944, and the defendants attempted to amend such original motion by filing the amended motion on February 14, 1944.
Rule 330, subdivision k, Texas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Independent Life Insurance Co. of America v. WorkTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. WilkirsonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Beaver v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Moeller v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Erwin v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Jones v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Bowman v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. KlingemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.