Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1949No. 4-8695Published

1DissentHolt, J.

It is my view, on the facts presented, that the decree making the temporary injunction permanent should be affirmed. I base my conclusion on our recent decision in Local Union No. 858, etc. v. Jiannas, 211 Ark. 352, 200 S. W. 2d 763, and on former decisions, Local Union No. 313 v. Stathakis, 135 Ark. 86, 205 S. W. 450, 6 A. L. R. 894, and Riggs v. Tucker Duck & Rubber Co., 196 Ark. 571, 119 S. W. 2d 507, reaffirmed in the Jiannas case.

As I read the record in the present case, the facts are even stronger in supporting the action of the trial court than were those in the Jiannas case, since…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Local Union No. 313, Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. StathakisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Meier v. SpeerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Riggs v. Tucker Duck & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API