Legal Opinion

Whitcher v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

On an appeal in another case arising out of the same accident involved here (233 App. Div. 184), a judgment in favor *294of the plaintiff was reversed and a new trial granted on the ground that upon the record then before us the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply. In addition to showing the happening of the accident and the injuries, plaintiff introduced proof attempting to show the causes of the breaking and falling of the glass from the transom. The majority of the court thought that direct evidence having been produced as to the cause of the accident, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitcher v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bressler v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Riley v. Capital Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Serbalik v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Cunningham v. Lence Lanes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Gross v. Temp Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API