Legal Opinion

Sanger v. Truesdail

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Question reserved from • St. Clair Circuit in Chancery. Defendant had interposed a plea to the hill of complaint, and the Circuit Judge reserved, for the opinion of this court, the'question whether the matters pleaded constituted in law a bar to the bill of complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

By The Court:.It is conceded here, on both sides, that the plea is bad. This is the only question on which the court below has asked of us our opinion; and when this is disposed of, any further advice we might give the court below would *10be quite outside the record, an argument in the case.*

We will not, therefore, hear

In the caso of The Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. Danis, which camo oil for hearing at the May Term, 1859, counsel for defendant in error, on the cause being called, conceded that thoro were some errors in the record, and that the judgment must be…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MoyerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API