State v. King
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Because neither a verbatim transcript nor adequate alternative is available to conduct a meaningful review of defendant’s habitual felon status hearing, we reverse and remand for a new habitual felon status hearing. We hold there was no error in defendant’s drug trial. However, because trial counsel conceded defendant’s guilt to the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia and the record is incomplete as to whether defendant consented to such a concession, we dismiss this issue without prejudice to defendant’s right to file a motion for appropriate relief in the trial court.
In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Alex ShackelfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016