Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 2012No. COA11-568PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Because neither a verbatim transcript nor adequate alternative is available to conduct a meaningful review of defendant’s habitual felon status hearing, we reverse and remand for a new habitual felon status hearing. We hold there was no error in defendant’s drug trial. However, because trial counsel conceded defendant’s guilt to the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia and the record is incomplete as to whether defendant consented to such a concession, we dismiss this issue without prejudice to defendant’s right to file a motion for appropriate relief in the trial court.

In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: Alex ShackelfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API