Legal Opinion

Vaught v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2003No. 2001-1970PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

{¶ 1} In 1997, plaintiff-appellee Carolyn A. Vaught sought treatment at the Cleveland Clinic for chronic right-knee pain. Defendant-appellant Dr. Peter J. Brooks, an employee of defendant-appellant the Cleveland Clinic, was her assigned physician. After an initial examination and consultation, Dr. Brooks recommended total knee-replacement surgery to alleviate appellee’s pain and to improve function and mobility. On December 10, 1997, Dr. Brooks performed the surgery, which required that he implant a tibial base plate.

{¶ 2} After the surgery, appellee continued to experience pain in her right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jones v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Smith v. WunschOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. Ross, 08ca872 (2-24-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Culp v. OlukogaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Dolan v. GlousterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API