Legal Opinion

Brunner v. Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal fromBay, Bill to set aside tax sales and vacate sewer assessment. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a bill filed by a large number of persons whose lots have been bid in by Bay City under a sewer assessment to have the sales set aside as illegal. The ground of illegality is that the sewer itself was not authorized to be built, nor the assessments authorized to be made in the manner adopted.

Without going at length into the questions presented, we are met at the outset by a difficulty which we cannot overlook. We do not find any warrant for any such joinder of grievances. The city now occupies the same position which would be occupied by any other tax purchaser who might choose to bid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Miller v. GrandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Scofield v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Kerr v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barker v. Township of VernonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Winslow v. JennessMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Douglass v. BoardmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kempinski v. Tuthill Building Material Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Lindblom v. Purity Ice & Refrigerating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API