Legal Opinion

Hagstrom v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 27, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

These actions to recover for personal injuries resulting from the collision of two automo*557biles proceeding in opposite directions were tried together. In the first, Hagstrom, a passenger in one of die cars, a Ford, sued George Sargent, the owner, and Bernice Sargent, the driver, of the other car, a Chevrolet. In the second, Bernice Sargent sued Hagstrom and McCarron, the driver of the Ford, alleging that they were engaged in a joint venture. The jury rendered a verdict for Hagstrom as plaintiff and a verdict for him and McCarron as defendants. The court set aside both verdicts and Hagstrom has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. DeLahunta v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Joanis v. EngstromSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Lessow v. SherrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Anderson v. ColucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Gosselin v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Thomas v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Nelson v. AugustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Dellarocco v. ScialabbaConnecticut Superior Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API