Legal Opinion

Liggett v. Glenn

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1892No. Nos. 61, 62PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Action by John Glenn, trustee of the National Express & Transportation Company, against John-E. Liggett, to recover an assessment on the stock' of said company. Judgment for plaintiff, allowing interest from the commencement of the suit. 47 Fed. Rep. 472. Both parties bring error, plaintiff complaining only of the allowance of interest as insufficient.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Action by John Glenn, trustee of the National Express & Transportation Company, against John-E. Liggett, to recover an assessment on the stock' of said company. Judgment for plaintiff, allowing interest from the commencement of the suit. 47 Fed. Rep. 472. Both parties bring error, plaintiff complaining only of the allowance of interest as insufficient. Statement by Shiras, District Judge: On the 12th of December, 1865, the general assembly of the state of Virginia adopted an act entitled “An act to amend…

1Opinion of the Court

Shiras, District Judge,

(after stating the facts.f The first position taken by counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the decrees or orders entered by the chancery court of the city of Richmond, and by the circuit court of Henrico county, Va., making assessments upon the capital, stock of the insolvent corporation, were mere nullities, for want of jurisdiction on part of said courts over the subject-matter and over the company named as defendant therein. The contention on part of the plaintiff in error is that the pendency of the suit brought by Reynolds in the. United States court in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  2. Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. O'Toole v. Ohio German Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. United States v. NealDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  5. Carey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API