Legal Opinion
DeHart v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 3, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00152Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TINA D.,1 Case No. 3:22-cv-152 Plaintiff, Bowman, M.J. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff filed this Social Security appeal in order to challenge the Defendant’s finding that she is not disabled. See 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Proceeding through counsel, Plaintiff presents three claims of error for this Court’s review.2 As explained below, the Court will AFFIRM the ALJ’s finding of non-disability, because it is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Margaret FELISKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.