Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 Y. MANSOUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 31, 2025, defendant Y. Mansour filed a motion for summary judgment 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .”…