Legal Opinion

Michel v. Efferson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 23, 1953No. 40201Published

1Opinion

*151On Rehearing

2DissentMoise, Justice

The majority opinion on rehearing is based upon the assumption that Mrs. Dumser, the .plaintiff, did not waive her right under the contract involved. That is exactly the position taken in this dissent, as hereinafter shown. “Modus et conventio vincunt legem” — The form of agreement and the convention of parties overrule the law. Both parties are bound by what they have solemnly covenanted. The contract involved is supposed to be commutative, but it is unilateral in form. The trial judge who heard and saw the witnesses, dismissed the plaintiff’s demands.

Since the contract of August…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API