Milner v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny; from Spalding superior court — Judge Reagan. September 13, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Exclusive of tlie testimony of the accomplice, tlie evidence
of the corpus delicti is uncertain and unsatisfactory; and the law requires that the testimony of the accomplice should be corroborated by other facts and circumstances, tending to establish the commission of the crime as charged in the indictment. Penal Code, §1005; Allen v. State, 4 Ga. App. 458 (61 S. E. 840); Bines v. State, 118 Ga. 320 (45 S. E. 376, 68 L. R. A. 33) ; 1 Enc. Ev. 105, and cases cited; Cornell v. State, 24 Tex. App. 404 (6 S. W. 318).
2. It is well settled that to warrant a conviction based on the testimony of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Bines v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Huey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933