Legal Opinion

State v. Nielsen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2018No. S-17-1033PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCassel, J.

**89 *161 INTRODUCTION

Matthew W. Nielsen was convicted for driving under the influence, after having submitted to a pre- Birchfield blood draw. Based upon the exclusionary rule's good faith exception, the county court denied Nielsen's motion to suppress. On appeal, the district court affirmed. On appeal to this court, Nielsen contends that the exception does not apply and that the State failed to raise the issue in the county court. Because our holding in State v. Hoerle 2 controls and because the State sufficiently raised the issue, the county court correctly denied the motion and the district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SundquistNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. HoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. KruseNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Thomas Grady Photography, Inc. v. Amazing Vapor, Ltd.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API