Legal Opinion

Knox Hat Co. v. Self-Service Millinery Stores, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant are respectively dealers in women’s hats, among other things. The plaintiff is a manufacturer also and has been in the business of manufacturing women’s hats for many years, nearly thirty, with a very high reputation for quality, material and workmanship. The plaintiff is entitled to the exclusive use of a shield or crest bearing the word “ THENOX.” I take the evidence to be that this word “ THENOX ” is not in use at the present time and was not in use by the plaintiff at the time of the beginning of this action, although the expression “ The Knox ” as applied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bregstone v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Knox Hat Co. v. Self-Service Millinery Stores, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York World's Fair 1939 Inc. v. World's Fair News, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Iannarelli v. Carvel Stores of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Dutchess Underwear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API