Legal Opinion

Boldt v. Herman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Gavagan, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding to review the determination of the State Rent Administrator, granting to the landlords certificates of eviction to enable them to demolish the premises in question for the purpose of constructing a new building containing additional accommodations.

*285The petitioners contend that the hearing before the Local Bent Commissioner was improper and unfair and that the tenants did not have an opportunity to really present their case or to inquire into the facts adequately; they further complain that the hearing officer refused to issue subpoenas to the Building…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Asco Equities, Inc. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Mayfair-York Corp. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Hammond v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. AltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Goldsmith v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API