Legal Opinion

People v. Fuller

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1925No. Docket No. 843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with wilfully and unlawfully maintaining a common nuisance at a certain house or building, numbered 1417 Twenty-second Street, in the city of Sacramento, county of Sacramento, state of California. From the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial the defendant appeals and assigns as grounds for reversal, to wit:

1. That the evidence is insufficient to establish the charge of maintaining a common nuisance;

2. That the court erred in its instructions to the jury;

3. That the defendant had been once placed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BuonocoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. RicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. HogelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API