Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olsen v. Chase

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 1, 2011No. 20090903-CAPublished

1DissentDavis, Presiding Judge

126 I do not agree that the statutory scheme at issue here necessarily prohibits subordination agreements between construction financing providers and contractors. Further, even were I to completely agree with the majority opinion's statutory analysis, I think Owners are entitled to restitution under the facts of this case.

127 First, I do not agree that the plain language of Utah Code section 38-1-29 nee-essarily leads to the interpretation set forth in the majority opinion. The statute states, "The applicability of the provisions of this chapter, including the waiver of rights or privileges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Li v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Beiwei Li v. Shuyu ZhangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  4. Brent Brown Dealerships v. Tax Commission, Motor Vehicle Enforcement DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API