Miller v. Fiss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendants from o der made by Third District Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
It appearing on the day to which the cause been adjourned that the defendants were not partners, as the plaintiff supposed they were, but officers of a corporation known as the *67Fiss, Doerr & Carroll Horse Co., and that such corporation should properly have been made defendant, the plaintiff moved and was allowed to reduce the recovery demanded in the summons from $100 to $49. Ho objection to the amendment was made in the court below, and the defendants apparently acquiesced in it. The question whether the power was judiciously exercised cannot be raised for thé first time on appeal.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hall v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Haulenbeck v. GilliesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858
- Nellis v. TurnerNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Waterbury Manufacturing Co. v. KrauseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858