Legal Opinion · Dissent

Naquin v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 2012No. 2011 CW 1217Published

1DissentKuhn, J.

hi disagree with the majority’s affir-mance of the trial court’s ruling on the exception of prescription. As the majority correctly notes, in reviewing a peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription, this court is required to strictly construe statutes against prescription and find in favor of maintaining a claim. See Onstott v. Certified Capital Corp., 2005-2548 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/3/06), 950 So.2d 744, 747. I believe the trial court, and now this court on appeal, has erred in its interpretation of the petition and therefore turned a blind eye to the requirement that we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terrel v. PerkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Onstott v. Certified Capital Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Vanderbrook v. JeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Scott v. HaleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API