Legal Opinion

Hines v. Columbia Livestock Market of Lake City, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1986No. BI-468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the summary judgment for defendant, Columbia Livestock Market of Lake City, Inc. Under the evidence shown in the record, it is clear that the veterinarian, Dr. Bryan Smith, was an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of defendant. Wendland v. Akers, 356 So.2d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Neither party has argued whether defendant was under a nondelegable duty to administer the brucellosis tests with reasonable care, which might make the livestock market responsible for the alleged negligence of Dr. Smith, so we find it unnecessary to consider such issue.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wendland v. AkersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HOME SAV. OF AMERICA, FA v. RoehnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Hines v. Columbia Livestock Market of Lake City, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API