Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bodner v. Feit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1936Published

1Dissent

Untermyer, J. (dissenting).

Giving to the complaint the most favorable interpretation, it alleges that Nathan Bodner, the deceased, at various times created trusts and made transfers of certain of his property for the benefit of his children. In the case of each trust, it is alleged, Nathan Bodner was trustee and there is also a general allegation, entirely consistent therewith, that until his death he “ exercised control over the said property.” The exact terms of the trusts are not set forth in the complaint, but from the allegation that Nathan Bodner “ received the rents, interests, profits…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Doctor v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Van Cott v. . PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API