State v. Acosta

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order revoking his probation on the ground that Rule 27, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., was not complied with. In particular, he contends that (1) he was not given a copy of written conditions of probation, as required by Rule 27.1, and (2) the court did not inform him at the beginning of the revocation hearing that he might be tried for the offense upon which the alleged violation was based, as required by Rule 27.-7(c)(1).

In support of his position, appellant relies on State v. Heasley, 23 Ariz.App. 345, 533 P.2d 556 (1975).…