Legal Opinion

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal, the defendant contends that the hearing court erred in denying his motion to suppress the statements he made to the police, because he was arrested without probable cause, and because, contrary to the hearing court’s finding, he invoked his right to counsel when he was arrested.

Contrary to the defendant’s claim, the codefendant’s statements made to the police and to an Assistant District Attorney specifically implicated the defendant in the crime and provided probable cause for the defendant’s arrest (see, People v Berzups, 49 NY2d 417; People v Crawford, 113 AD2d 771). Further,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. BerzupsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. SafianNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. McNeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BostickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API