Legal Opinion

Reinhart & Newton Co. v. State

Hamilton County Court

Decided April 5, 1915Published

1Opinion of the Court

Jones (Oliver B.), J.

The proceedings below originated from a prosecution of plaintiff in error, a corporation, for the violation of Section 1008, General Code, in the employment of females over eighteen years of age more than ten hours in one day.

It is claimed that the conviction was erroneous • for the reason that the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction of defendant because no provision has been made by statute, when an' affidavit charging such an offense is filed, for the service oí a warrant upon a corporation. Section 13496, General Code, provides for the issue of a warrant and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webster v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  2. Jolley v. HardemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API