Legal Opinion

Enright v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 10, 2004No. Civil Action 03-5640 (JEI)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge.

Currently before the Court is Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner argues that his sentence should be vacated and corrected because he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). For the reasons set forth below, the Petitioner’s application is denied.

I

Daniel Enright was convicted on June 19, 1998, after a nine and a half month trial, of one court of conspiracy to defraud the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. PurcellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. BAKER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. BAKER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. CARTER v. MOONEYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API