Legal Opinion

Raynor v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Municipal Court of Milwaukee County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.

This action is brought to this court upon a writ of error, directed to the municipal court of Milwaukee, for the purpose of reviewing a judgment of that court rendered upon a criminal complaint against the said plaintiff in error for a violation of the provisions of sec. 1, ch. 256, Laws of 1881. Upon the hearing of this case the learned attor*290ney general made no argument upon the merits of the case, but contented himself with moving to dismiss the action on the ground that this court had no authority to issue a writ of error to the said municipal court to bring up for review a judgment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. United States v. HaywardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1815
  3. Harrison v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. McNab v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kreutzer v. WestfahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Hamilton v. Municipal Court of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Watke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State Medical Society v. MansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State ex rel. Cooper v. BrazeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API