Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 31, 1996No. NMCM 95 02066Published

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Senior Judge:

We hold in this case that trial counsel’s references to the Navy’s zero-tolerance policy toward drug abuse that were made during voir dire and his argument on sentence were improper, and that such comments constituted error, but that in light of the lack of objection by defense counsel, we must examine the case for plain error. Under the circumstances of this case, we do not find plain error and affirm.

Facts

The appellant pled guilty to an unauthorized absence of about 17 months and the wrongful use of marijuana in violation of Articles 86 and 112a, Uniform Code of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. GradyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. KropfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. SchomakerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API