Legal Opinion

Garr v. Kinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered April 1, 2003, which, in an action to recover a legal fee, denied defendant’s motion to vacate a restraining notice on her bank account, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While it appears that defendant deposits into the subject account maintenance and child support payments made by her ex-husband pursuant to the agreement that settled their divorce, that settlement agreement shows that defendant has ample other resources and is not dependent on the money in the account for her or her dependents’ daily living expenses and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garr v. KinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinberg v. KinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API