Brantley Co. v. Memory

Wyatt, Justice.

The first question presented is whether or not it was error to allow the amendments to the answer of the defendant, and to refuse to strike the answer. It is contended that the original answer was no answer and should have been stricken. This can not be true for the reason that the petition alleged a claim for damages and sought an injunction. The denial of the allegations, the bajsis for seeking this relief, certainly amounted to an answer and was not subject to be stricken.

It is further contended that the answer should have been stricken, for the reason that the defendant had…