Legal Opinion

McLemore v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 2018No. CV–17–698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal, McLemore argues that DHS failed to prove the aggravated-circumstances ground. According to McLemore, the trial court erroneously relied on the caseworker's testimony regarding the protective-services case. She points out that the caseworker admitted that no valid case plan had been established in the protective-services case and that McLemore had not signed any documents advising her of DHS's goals or expectations. Further, McLemore maintains that DHS had to prove that appropriate family services *737were offered in this case, not the protective-services case.

We note that McLemore's…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Androff v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Hunter v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor ChildCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API